This Proposal Could Solve Ethereum’s Congestion Problem

Key Takeaways
Ethereum could introduce a new and simplified system of transaction fees with lower costs for users.
The standard has been under discussion for over a year and is slowly making progress toward implementation.
EIP-1559 is just one of many solutions to Ethereum’s congestion problem.
Share this article

Ethereum developers are considering a proposal that would improve transaction fees and help solve network congestion. That proposal, EIP-1559, has been under discussion since April 2019 and has the potential to drastically change how fees work on Ethereum.
How It Works
Right now, the Ethereum network sets fees by “first price auctions.” Every user that makes a transaction states a gas price that they are willing to pay. Users that pay the highest fees are generally approved first. (Gas limits, another parameter, also come into play).
As EIP-1559’s documentation notes, the current system is “inefficient and needlessly costly to users.” By contrast, EIP-1559 would let users know how much they need to spend on fees. That amount would be automatically calculated and adjusted based on overall network demand.
Under EIP-1559, users would pay a “base fee” and a premium fee, thereby defining the maximum fee that they are willing to pay. This can also be seen as paying a “tip” to miners. Base fees would be “burned,” and miners would only keep the tip. Finally, the new standard would require fees to be paid in ETH tokens, not ERC-20 tokens or Ethereum-based altcoins.

The Bigger Picture
If EIP-1559 is successful, it could provide a better user experience and prove that Ethereum can scale up along with demand.
Eric Conner of Gnosis suggests that the change could reduce fees by 90% and that it should be “seriously considered” in future upgrades.
David Hoffman of RealT and POV Crypto argues that the feature is a vital part of Ethereum’s monetary policy, “comparable to a nation-state demanding that only their native currency be legal tender.”
On the other hand, EIP-1559 has been criticized on several fronts.  It could open up the possibility of fee manipulation among miners, could have unwanted effects on miner incentives, or could be incompatible with Ethereum’s broader economics and rules.

The solutions to these problems are beyond the scope of this article, but responses to these questions are outlined in the proposal.
Ethereum’s Congestion Issues
Solving congestion is a critical task for Ethereum. Since March, the blockchain has been congested, first due to high-traffic NFT projects like Crypto Kitties and more recently due to Tether and the Ponzi scheme MMM.
EIP-1559 is just one of many changes that could improve Ethereum’s efficiency and help it scale up with demand. Other solutions include metatransactions, secondary fuel sources, changes to block size limits, and changes to gas limits.
Ethereum 2.0, which will introduce sharding and proof-of-stake validation, will also improve the blockchain’s efficiency. It is not yet clear when EIP-1559 will be enabled, but it has the potential to be one part of a larger solution.

Share this article

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.
You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.
See full terms and conditions.

Highest Ethereum Transaction Fee Ever? Someone Accidentally Paid a $2….

Understanding Ethereum’s Gas and Transaction Fees

Data Shows Ethereum Is Better Money Than Bitcoin

Previous post Highest Ethereum Transaction Fee Ever? Someone Accidentally Paid a $2.5 Million Fee
Next post MixNet 5.0 Superstructure Powered Blockchain Ecosystem ATROMG8 Soon to be Listed on Global Trading Exchange ProBit, South Korea